Players
Teodora Injac
Photo: Paul Meyer-Dunker, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
IM

Teodora Injac

SerbiaBorn 2000 (age 26)FIDE ID 932400

Luft classical

23002400250026002023202420252026
Monthly Luft ratings, now 2393
FIDE

FIDE classical

2000220024002600201620182020202220242026
Monthly FIDE ratings, now 2394
Luft

Flair

Teodora Injac's classical flairs

1 of 19 earned over the last 12 months

  • Underdog3 wins against players rated 50+ higher
  • TitanLuft classical rating averaging 2800+ over the last 4 years
  • Serial WinnerWon 2+ elite events in the last 12 months
  • Fortress25+ games in a row without a loss
  • Black BeltDoes better with black than with white
  • IronmanPlayed 50+ games over the last 12 months
  • RisingAged 18 or under, Luft rating up 40+ over the last 12 months
  • Endgame SpecialistEndgame 90+: converting, saving and not throwing endgames
  • TacticianTactics 90+: sharp, tactical games they made sharp
  • LightningTop 20 at speed chess (mostly blitz, some rapid)
  • Hot StreakAt least 6 points from 7 straight games against strong opposition
  • SignatureSticks to one defence with black far more than most
  • ChameleonPlays a wide range of defences with black
  • WildcardBrilliant one event, off the next: hard to predict
  • ReliableConsistent across all top events
  • FighterRarely draws, and wins far more than they lose
  • AdaptableTactics and Positional both 90+
  • PositionalPositional 90+: slow, quiet games they steered
  • PodiumTop 3 in at least half of their elite events
  • Underdog

Trophy cabinet

Teodora Injac's classical titles

2 classical titles, 1 medal, newest first

  • European Championship×2

Attributes

Tactics 65Positional 70Endgame 76Openings 68Composure 54Defence 66Speed 60Consistency 64

Luft classical rating

2393No. 399

From 33 classical games in top events over the last year, playing at a 2410 level.

ResultsPlayed at a 2410 level, blended with their FIDE rating+4
Tournament winsNone in the last year0
FormThe last 3 months against the whole year−10
ConsistencyHow steady they are from event to event+4
Activity33 classical games in top events+1

Openings

Their most-played, from 87 classical games in top events over the last 4 years

OpeningGamesScore
Queen's Pawn Game650%
King's Indian Attack642%
Nimzo-Indian Defense570%
English Opening570%
Sicilian Defense450%

Queen's Pawn Game

With White: 6 games, won 2, drew 2, lost 2 · 50%

VariationGamesScore
London System350%
Colle System275%
Symmetrical Variation10%

King's Indian Attack

With White: 6 games, won 2, drew 1, lost 3 · 42%

VariationGamesScore
Main line367%
Double Fianchetto150%
Sicilian Variation10%
Spassky Variation10%

Nimzo-Indian Defense

With White: 5 games, won 3, drew 1, lost 1 · 70%

VariationGamesScore
Normal Variation383%
St. Petersburg Variation1100%
Sämisch Variation10%

English Opening

With White: 5 games, won 3, drew 1, lost 1 · 70%

VariationGamesScore
Caro-Kann Defensive System1100%
Anglo-Indian Defense1100%
King's English Variation1100%
Symmetrical Variation150%
Agincourt Defense10%

Sicilian Defense

With White: 4 games, won 1, drew 2, lost 1 · 50%

VariationGamesScore
Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack1100%
Moscow Variation150%
Delayed Alapin Variation150%
Accelerated Dragon10%

Queen's Gambit Declined

With Black: 7 games, won 0, drew 2, lost 5 · 14%

VariationGamesScore
Exchange Variation317%
Three Knights Variation225%
Charousek Variation10%
Ragozin Defense10%

Sicilian Defense

With Black: 6 games, won 1, drew 1, lost 4 · 25%

VariationGamesScore
Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack333%
Alapin Variation150%
Godiva Variation10%
Old Sicilian10%

Nimzo-Indian Defense

With Black: 5 games, won 0, drew 2, lost 3 · 20%

VariationGamesScore
Normal Variation20%
Classical Variation150%
Spielmann Variation150%
St. Petersburg Variation10%

Ruy Lopez

With Black: 4 games, won 0, drew 3, lost 1 · 38%

VariationGamesScore
Closed225%
Berlin Defense150%
Open Berlin Defense150%

English Opening

With Black: 4 games, won 0, drew 2, lost 2 · 25%

VariationGamesScore
Symmetrical Variation225%
Agincourt Defense150%
Anglo-Indian Defense10%

Recent events

See all
EventPlace+/−+/−
41st European Chess Club Cup 202622 Oct 20263/5−6−6
Serbian Super League 202614 Oct 20264½/9−6−5
46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 202625 Sep 20265/8−1−1
European Individual Chess Championship 202618 Apr 2026=89th+11+11
Reykjavik Open 202630 Mar 2026=23rd+2+7

Best wins

OpponentRating
GMP. Pultinevicius16 Nov 2024 · European Individual Chess Championship 20242599
GMB. Tiglon27 Mar 2026 · Reykjavik Open 20262550
GMG. Kantor13 Apr 2026 · European Individual Chess Championship 20262544
GMM. Olszewski12 Apr 2026 · European Individual Chess Championship 20262516
IMG. Mammadzada20 Nov 2023 · European Team Championship2441

Most played

OpponentGamesWDL
GMA. UsheninaLast 9 Oct 2026 · Serbian Super League 20263021
IMN. BuksaLast 7 Oct 2026 · Serbian Super League 20262101
GMA. KosteniukLast 6 Aug 2023 · FIDE World Cup 20232020
IMP. ShuvalovaLast 10 Aug 2023 · FIDE World Cup 20232011
IMM. EfroimskiLast 6 Sep 2025 · FIDE Grand Swiss 20252011

Compare Luft

IMTeodora InjacSerbia

Pick a player to compare with Teodora Injac

How attributes are calculated

From their games in top events over the last 12 months, each judged against the opponent's rating

  • TacticsHow well they score in sharp games they chose to make sharp.
  • PositionalHow well they score in quiet, manoeuvring games they steered.
  • EndgameHow they do in endgames against what the position promised when it began: converting a winning one earns a little, saving a losing one earns a lot, and throwing a winning one costs a lot.
  • OpeningsThe engine's verdict on their position around moves 15 to 20, against what's normal for that colour, as the score it points to. Over the last 4 years, with older games counting less.
  • ComposureHow well they score under pressure: the game straight after a loss, and the last 3 games of an event while they can still win it. Over the last 4 years.
  • DefenceHow they do in games where they were 0.8 pawns or more worse after move 18, against what that position usually scores: holding the draw earns, turning it around earns more, and losing costs a little.
  • SpeedTheir Luft rapid and blitz ratings. With neither, an estimate a little below their classical level.
  • ConsistencyTheir Luft rating, less their off days: tournaments (5+ games each) over the last 4 years where they played 50+ below it. Anything better never counts against them.

  • "How well they score" is a performance rating: the opponent's rating, plus 400 for a win and minus 400 for a loss, averaged. So it's always judged against who they played.

    The score out of 100: 80 is a 2600 level, and each 13 rating points adds one, so 2860 and up is 100.

    Fair to everyone: with only a few games of a kind, the result leans towards their overall Luft rating. Strengths and weaknesses are measured against their overall level and compared with the top 100, so a specialist's best side stands out. A little recent form is added to all but Speed.