Players
Deimante Daulyte-Cornette
Photo: ECU
IM

Deimante Daulyte-Cornette

FranceBorn 1989 (age 37)FIDE ID 12802859

Luft classical

230023502400245025002023202420252026
Monthly Luft ratings, now 2375
FIDE

FIDE classical

2300240025002600201620182020202220242026
Monthly FIDE ratings, now 2386
Luft

Flair

Deimante Daulyte-Cornette's classical flairs

0 of 19 earned over the last 12 months

  • TitanLuft classical rating averaging 2800+ over the last 4 years
  • Serial WinnerWon 2+ elite events in the last 12 months
  • UnderdogRegularly beats players rated 50+ higher
  • Fortress25+ games in a row without a loss
  • Black BeltDoes better with black than with white
  • IronmanPlayed 50+ games over the last 12 months
  • RisingAged 18 or under, Luft rating up 40+ over the last 12 months
  • Endgame SpecialistEndgame 90+: converting, saving and not throwing endgames
  • TacticianTactics 90+: sharp, tactical games they made sharp
  • LightningTop 20 at speed chess (mostly blitz, some rapid)
  • Hot StreakAt least 6 points from 7 straight games against strong opposition
  • SignatureSticks to one defence with black far more than most
  • ChameleonPlays a wide range of defences with black
  • WildcardBrilliant one event, off the next: hard to predict
  • ReliableConsistent across all top events
  • FighterRarely draws, and wins far more than they lose
  • AdaptableTactics and Positional both 90+
  • PositionalPositional 90+: slow, quiet games they steered
  • PodiumTop 3 in at least half of their elite events

No classical flair in the last year yet.

Trophy cabinet

Deimante Daulyte-Cornette's classical titles

1 classical title, 1 medal, newest first

  • French Championship 

Attributes

Tactics 73Positional 65Endgame 63Openings 68Composure 70Defence 72Speed 57Consistency 67

Luft classical rating

2375No. 408

From 33 classical games in top events over the last year, playing at a 2360 level.

ResultsPlayed at a 2360 level, blended with their FIDE rating−5
Tournament winsNone in the last year0
FormThe last 3 months against the whole year0
ConsistencyHow steady they are from event to event−7
Activity33 classical games in top events+1

Openings

Their most-played, from 65 classical games in top events over the last 4 years

OpeningGamesScore
Sicilian Defense1238%
French Defense488%
Ruy Lopez463%
Philidor Defense438%
Italian Game425%

Sicilian Defense

With White: 12 games, won 3, drew 3, lost 6 · 38%

VariationGamesScore
Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack383%
Najdorf Variation225%
Taimanov Variation20%
Scheveningen Variation20%
Old Sicilian1100%
French Variation150%
Closed10%

French Defense

With White: 4 games, won 3, drew 1, lost 0 · 88%

VariationGamesScore
Exchange Variation2100%
Tarrasch Variation1100%
Advance Variation150%

Ruy Lopez

With White: 4 games, won 1, drew 3, lost 0 · 63%

VariationGamesScore
Closed367%
Morphy Defense150%

Philidor Defense

With White: 4 games, won 1, drew 1, lost 2 · 38%

VariationGamesScore
Lion Variation438%

Italian Game

With White: 4 games, won 0, drew 2, lost 2 · 25%

VariationGamesScore
Giuoco Pianissimo225%
Classical Variation150%
Scotch Invitation Declined10%

Sicilian Defense

With Black: 9 games, won 4, drew 5, lost 0 · 72%

VariationGamesScore
Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack367%
Kalashnikov Variation1100%
French Variation1100%
Hyperaccelerated Dragon1100%
Accelerated Dragon150%
Löwenthal Variation150%
Grand Prix Attack150%

Queen's Gambit Declined

With Black: 6 games, won 1, drew 3, lost 2 · 42%

VariationGamesScore
Exchange Variation350%
Barmen Variation225%
Queen's Knight Variation150%

English Opening

With Black: 4 games, won 0, drew 2, lost 2 · 25%

VariationGamesScore
Symmetrical Variation250%
Agincourt Defense10%
King's English Variation10%

Italian Game

With Black: 4 games, won 0, drew 0, lost 4 · 0%

VariationGamesScore
Scotch Gambit10%
Two Knights Defense10%
Giuoco Pianissimo10%
Classical Variation10%

Nimzo-Indian Defense

With Black: 2 games, won 1, drew 1, lost 0 · 75%

VariationGamesScore
Normal Variation1100%
Main line150%

Recent events

See all
EventPlace+/−+/−
41st European Chess Club Cup 202622 Oct 20263½/5−10
Serbian Super League 202614 Oct 20265½/10+4+9
46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 202627 Sep 20265/9−12−12
French TOP 12 202617 May 20264/5+2+2
Italian Team Championship 202627 Apr 2026½/3−25−25

Best wins

OpponentRating
GMB. Khotenashvili17 Nov 2023 · European Team Championship2498
IMS. Khademalsharieh12 Oct 2025 · European Team Chess Championship 20252444
GMP. Cramling13 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20242425
IMT. Injac25 Sep 2026 · 46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 20262406
IMD. Wagner9 Aug 2025 · Sparkassen Chess Trophy 20252404

Most played

OpponentGamesWDL
GME. PaehtzLast 10 Aug 2025 · Sparkassen Chess Trophy 20253021
IMD. WagnerLast 14 May 2026 · French TOP 12 20263102
IML. MkrtchianLast 26 Feb 2024 · Chess Graz 20242020
GMA. UsheninaLast 13 Oct 2026 · Serbian Super League 20262020
WGMM. AlinasabLast 18 Sep 2026 · 46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 20262011

Compare Luft

IMDeimante Daulyte-CornetteFrance

Pick a player to compare with Deimante Daulyte-Cornette

How attributes are calculated

From their games in top events over the last 12 months, each judged against the opponent's rating

  • TacticsHow well they score in sharp games they chose to make sharp.
  • PositionalHow well they score in quiet, manoeuvring games they steered.
  • EndgameHow they do in endgames against what the position promised when it began: converting a winning one earns a little, saving a losing one earns a lot, and throwing a winning one costs a lot.
  • OpeningsThe engine's verdict on their position around moves 15 to 20, against what's normal for that colour, as the score it points to. Over the last 4 years, with older games counting less.
  • ComposureHow well they score under pressure: the game straight after a loss, and the last 3 games of an event while they can still win it. Over the last 4 years.
  • DefenceHow they do in games where they were 0.8 pawns or more worse after move 18, against what that position usually scores: holding the draw earns, turning it around earns more, and losing costs a little.
  • SpeedTheir Luft rapid and blitz ratings. With neither, an estimate a little below their classical level.
  • ConsistencyTheir Luft rating, less their off days: tournaments (5+ games each) over the last 4 years where they played 50+ below it. Anything better never counts against them.

  • "How well they score" is a performance rating: the opponent's rating, plus 400 for a win and minus 400 for a loss, averaged. So it's always judged against who they played.

    The score out of 100: 80 is a 2600 level, and each 13 rating points adds one, so 2860 and up is 100.

    Fair to everyone: with only a few games of a kind, the result leans towards their overall Luft rating. Strengths and weaknesses are measured against their overall level and compared with the top 100, so a specialist's best side stands out. A little recent form is added to all but Speed.